In theory, academia should scare me less.

I’m sitting here before class trying to rewrite my meta-fiction research paper. Given the fact that you’re reading this, the efforts have been less than successful. This semester has been a lot of meta. Meta-fiction, meta-knowledge, meta-literacy…the lay version of explaining all of that is the über-discussion about a topic. Questions which wonder about how exactly we are learning, and in the case of meta-fiction, there is something else the author/narrator wants to say outside of the story, something direct and in a way which would effect the readers reality in ways a simpler storyline might not.

 

So in my paper I’m trying, as per usual, to write to the given audience, my teacher. I didn’t really think too much about whether or not I should use The Neverending Story as an example a universal meta-fiction story. Boy reads book, boy becomes part of book. (There’s more to it than that, in both story and meta-fiction, but there’s a rough sketch.) I end up phrasing it thusly, “an example that most everyone has heard [of meta-fiction] of is the The Neverending Story.”

 

I get the paper back (which I got a B on by the way, I’m only rewriting for an A so that I’m allowed to write a short story as a final paper) and above that statement is written, ‘Not me.’ Who hasn’t heard of The Neverending Story? What English teacher hasn’t heard of that? What English teacher with children my age hasn’t heard of that at all?

 

I also wonder if this is a symptom of the strange academia land of culture that I worry about falling into, with my very own monocle and haughty tones. Is this über-culture what my teacher may have been afflicted with? So steeped in the avant-garde that you lose sight on popular culture? And at that point, how can you even hope to write a relatable universal story if don’t have some sort of sense of heartbeat on what humans consider relevant?

 

And then she complains that I have a tin ear for writing. But that’s a whole other rant.

Advertisements

4 Responses to In theory, academia should scare me less.

  1. eatsbugs says:

    I think you picked a great topic. I watched the movie both as a child and as an adult, and I find it much more terrifying as an adult. There are things you can’t even grasp as a child that will eat you alive when you are older.

    Hopefully, your prof is just a retard, and not actually right, cause that would make me wrong too.

    And curious, did you get a B because they hadn’t heard of the story before, or because of something else?

  2. firewings says:

    Oh, I think I got a B because I tackled some other harder works in the paper, like John Barth’s Lost in the Funhouse. She liked that I tried to wrestle with a bigger concepts than what other students in the class were doing. Even though, oddly enough, that was assumed since I was taking the class for graduate credit.

  3. eatsbugs says:

    But that means the B was better than what you would have gotten? I’m confused. Prof liked what you did and you still only get a medium grade?

  4. The Rebuker says:

    To be fair, a ‘B’ is still an above average grade.
    Also, was this a creative writing prof? I know you’d expect them to be all hip and irreverent and up on pop culture, but they are often so into the “craft” that they can’t extract their creative heads from their metafictional asses. Who hasn’t heard of The Neverending Story? Come on!
    Also, I agree with eatsbugs: it provides a much more intense and disturbing viewing experience as an adult.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: